Have you tried the latest version of Traccar?
I tried 5.8, but my users are very conservative ;) and don't accept new look.
The look has nothing to do with the server version. The old web app is still available and bundled with each new version of Traccar.
So I'll take a look at the new version. But back to the question - can filters affect the quality of reports? Or am I just now noticing a problem that has been there for a long time?
They won't make it show different numbers of items in the reports.
Thanks for Your reply. I understand that the only thing I can do is update Traccar.
I don't know if it's the only thing, but we don't usually provide support for old versions.
I see, maybe some tips on where to look for the cause? Time zone, report.fastThreshold, report.trip.minimalTripDistance or other report parameters?
I looked at more data and I feel like the reports use a different time zone. Is it possible?
I miss trips ending in the evening.
I compared this week's reports taken in the morning and in the evening. In the evening there are new yesterday's trips.
You have to have a stop detected after the trip for it to be included in the report.
Maybe the use of filters causes no stop signal until the next trip begins. Is it possible?
Very possible.
If so, this should probably help:
<entry key='filter.skipLimit'>3600</entry>
Does this make sense?
I added it to the configuration. We'll find out tomorrow.
Hi,
I noticed that the trip report for yesterday shows too few trips. The weekly report shows that there were more trips on this day, the route report also.
Recently I added some filters:
<entry key='filter.enable'>true</entry> <entry key='filter.invalid'>true</entry> <entry key='filter.zero'>true</entry> <entry key='filter.duplicate'>true</entry> <entry key='filter.distance'>30</entry> <entry key='coordinates.filter'>true</entry> <entry key='coordinates.minError'>20</entry> <entry key='coordinates.maxError'>30000</entry>
Does this have any impact on reports?
Traccar 4.11