Open GPS Tracker device?

darreno8 years ago

I have tried many versions of Chinese made GPS tracking devices.

I was wondering, if we have an open Tracking platform like Traccar, why not build an open GPS tracking unit?
I have source Global SIM's that work well in any GPS device, now the Traccar mapping, is there interest in an Open GPS tracking unit?
My background is hardware, is there interest in open hardware?

Ublox has a fairly inexpensive cellular modem, GPS, https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/SARA-U2_DataSheet_%28UBX-13005287%29.pdf

Anton Tananaev8 years ago

I think there will be a lot of interest if price is comparable to Chinese made GPS devices.

bmelendez8 years ago

Ublox is very common and standard for Chinese GPS devices. The cost of developing and manufacturing such a device is very prohibiting even if using a Chinese electronics manufacturer. As a hardware guy I can tell you that start up costs are high and difficult to compete price wise. While an open GPS hardware is great idea, the reason there are so many different protocols is basically ROI --the need to recoup costs in development and manufacturing.

It is best to use the Ublox chip within a unique application that requires GPS --such as drones (similar to vehicle tracking) which already has that but could use another and better entrant solution -particularly if Traccar has the capability to include altitude, etc.

Anton Tananaev8 years ago

Thanks for feedback.

Traccar does support altitude and many other attributes.

bmelendez8 years ago

Good to know Anton. Possibly use the geo-fencing to create air traffic corridors or no-fly zones. That would be awesome. Thanks.

darreno8 years ago

Have you heard of the Particle Electron? The nice thing about Particle is that their hardware and cloud based code is open source. They also can manufacture GPS tracking units based on their design or you modify it and place orders.
I've played with a lot of Chinese units, dealt with a lot of Chinese manufacturers over the past few years, and this is the cat's ass to use as a foundation.

https://www.particle.io/products/hardware/asset-tracker

STM32F205 ARM Cortex M3 microcontroller
1MB Flash, 128K RAM
Cellular modem: U-Blox SARA U-series (3G)
36 pins total: 28 GPIOs (D0-D13, A0-A13), plus TX/RX, 2 GNDs, VIN, VBAT, WKP, 3V3, RST
Board dimensions: 2.0" x 0.8" x 0.3" (0.5" including headers)

Anton Tananaev8 years ago

The price is comparable to good branded GPS tracking devices.

Anton Tananaev8 years ago

So what's needed is just a phone and the paid service on the app, then we can use the tracking service directly without any other requirements ?

miro8 years ago

I'm a long term traccar user and currently planning to develop an open source tracker based on this hardware:
https://www.elecrow.com/32u4-with-a7-gprs-gsm-gps-board.html

But I wonder which protocol I should implement? It would be great if it will be a available for UDP.

@tananaev: As you implement different protocols for traccar: which one do you think is most versatile?

Anton Tananaev8 years ago

You can implement some protocol like Teltonika. It's very flexible, but I'm not sure what the legal implications are because it's a proprietary protocol.

darreno8 years ago

The problem is the modem. GPRS is a 2G technology that is being phased out. Look for product that don't list GSM or GPRS but UMTS, HSPA, HSPA+ or LTE instead. Investing in 2G/GSM/GPRS technologies is not a good idea for long term use.